Digital Access

Digital Access
Access morrisherald-news.com from all your digital devices and receive breaking news and updates from around the area.

Mail Delivery

Mail Delivery
We’ve got you covered! Get the best in local news, sports, community events, with focus on what’s coming up for the weekend. Weekly packages.

Text Alerts

Text Alerts
Choose your news! Select the text alerts you want to receive: breaking news, weather, and more.

Email Newsletters

Email Newsletters
Have our latest news, sports and obituaries emailed directly to you Monday through Friday so you can keep up with what's happening in Morris and Grundy County.
The Holiday Gift Auction is Live! Click here and bid now on great local gifts!

Peavy contract a good one for White Sox

shaw-push-component

When I first heard $29 million guaranteed over two years for Jake Peavy, my first reaction was that it was a fair deal for the White Sox, but not really a great one.

The last White Sox major pitcher re-signing that I endorsed as fair was John Danks' five-year extension. Danks made nine starts in an injury-plagued first season of that deal in 2012, going 3-4 with a 5.70 ERA, a 30-23 K-BB ratio and a 5.01 FIP. I don't think there's much question that if the Sox could take a mulligan on that one, they'd do it in a heartbeat.

That's why I'm not sure a straight 2-year, $29-million deal with Peavy would be adventageous for the White Sox. It's a big risk giving out big guaranteed money to the healthiest of pitchers. Peavy, who made 13, 3, 17 and 19 starts a season from 2008 to 2011, isn't the healthiest of pitchers. Based on his 2012, when he made 32 starts and pitched 219 innings with a 194-49 K-BB ratio, a 3.37 ERA and a 3.73 FIP, he's a bargain at that price. But Peavy's age (31) and injury history make committing to him a gamble (not necessarily an incorrect one, but a gamble nonetheless), even if it's just for two years.

What makes the contract a clear win for the White Sox is that it includes a vesting option for a third year. If Peavy pitches a certain number of innings in 2013 and 2014, the option kicks in. And if Peavy pitches a relatively high number of innings in the next two seasons, it's a great bet that he'll deliver more production, relative to market value, than he'll be paid ... and that he'd be worth re-signing at the price of $15 million for one year in 2015.

I've advocated for the White Sox to rebuild in the past, but they were good enough in 2012 — and have enough money committed to veteran players— that I'd do what I can to try and win what should be a winnable AL Central in 2013. Bringing back Peavy certainly increases their chances.

Comments